A songwriter friend of mine said that he preferred Jewel Case over Digipak. His reasons was that digipak was more fragile. It could be damaged easier. If a jewel case breaks you can replace it for cheap.
I felt that his reasons made good practical sense. But for me there is no contest. I prefer digipak. Yes it is more fragile, but it comes closer to what vinyl albums used to be like. They are more beautiful to look at and and there are more possibilities for different types of packaging than with the jewel case. Also the fact that it is more fragile means that you have to take better care of them (Which is what you had to do with records). It makes you value them more.
Sadly, from the indie artist standpoint of things, it is also too expensive for me to use. All of my CDs have been released in the Jewell case format. I can’t afford the digipak format yet……but maybe someday……….

3 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 16, 2008 at 1:33 pm
Brett Terry
I constantly have this dilemma. I keep looking for the lowest number of DigiPaks you can have done with a replicator so you can avoid having a short run CD-R. The answer seems to be 500, for now, which is getting slightly easier to swallow…
-brett
October 16, 2008 at 4:04 pm
musicworthbuying
Discmakers just lowered their prices recently. In time it will get easier.
May 1, 2009 at 11:04 pm
digipak
We are the only company in the world selling digipaks cheaper then jewel case.